Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Discussion regarding human resource management.

Moderators: Respond Wayne, Pete Broccolo, opp2, CourtOfficer

User avatar
gotchya
Poobah Overlord
Posts: 4954
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:37 pm
Location: 10-20

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby gotchya » Tue May 05, 2009 8:01 pm

el_prez wrote:Image

Those armbands look like something a two year old would wear when swimming.
Oh, the waterwings.
Image
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."-Burke, Edmund
ImageImage

Jim Street
Super-Ultra-Mega Poobah
Posts: 7335
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby Jim Street » Tue May 05, 2009 8:05 pm

th wrote:The CSOs are basically paid, full-time auxiliaries. In fact, most of the CSOs were hired out of the Auxiliary program.
So very, very wrong.
Opinions posted are my own sole opinion not reflective of any views/thoughts of agency. Answers may or may not be truthful, As if you couldn't tell.

User avatar
CourtOfficer
Site Admin
Posts: 19612
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby CourtOfficer » Tue May 05, 2009 10:16 pm

A slippery slope...

One of their duties is to "investigate B&E's"? Last I checked that involved chasing property all over hell's half acre, interrogating suspects, etc... You want someone with three weeks training and no gun to do that?

Any department with an association would have prevented this from seeing the light of day.

CO

User avatar
Mark S
Super-Ultra-Mega Poobah
Posts: 7272
Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Manitoba
Contact:

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby Mark S » Tue May 05, 2009 10:52 pm

I'm going to give them the benefit of the doubt and say that the "investigation" they'll be doing is attending late-reported B&Es to take the report and maybe seize some evidence at the scene. But, you never know. You're right, its a slippery slope.
Welcome to Winnipeg. We were born here, what's your excuse?

Jim Street
Super-Ultra-Mega Poobah
Posts: 7335
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby Jim Street » Wed May 06, 2009 8:19 pm

We have a policy wherein if the b & e When a call is made, dispatch will give some advice like not to touch anything that may be printable or whatever. However, that's hardly piece of mind for the homeowner and they have to wait 12-24 hours for a police officer to come by.

Now you're going to have some guy in a hybrid police uniform, no training and experience come to a regular joe or norma's house taking a report and gathering any evidence? They're obviously not going to be doing anything except forwarding the information on to an investigator but it's still stupid.

They're paying these people to do the jobs of cops when they could be used in a support function and/or use the money to pay for MORE COPS. Slippery slope indeed and no association would stand for it, I don't think.
Opinions posted are my own sole opinion not reflective of any views/thoughts of agency. Answers may or may not be truthful, As if you couldn't tell.

User avatar
three-six
Sage Member
Posts: 518
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby three-six » Wed May 06, 2009 8:30 pm

Jim Street wrote:We have a policy wherein if the b & e When a call is made, dispatch will give some advice like not to touch anything that may be printable or whatever. However, that's hardly piece of mind for the homeowner and they have to wait 12-24 hours for a police officer to come by.

Now you're going to have some guy in a hybrid police uniform, no training and experience come to a regular joe or norma's house taking a report and gathering any evidence? They're obviously not going to be doing anything except forwarding the information on to an investigator but it's still stupid.

They're paying these people to do the jobs of cops when they could be used in a support function and/or use the money to pay for MORE COPS. Slippery slope indeed and no association would stand for it, I don't think.
You bring up a very good point Jim. Why not put these extra dollars towards more police officers rather than "Community Safety Officers"? I know for a fact that I would rather have a cop show up and investigate than a "Community Safety Officer". The moment I would see those red armbands, I would shut that door so fast... :roll:
--

User avatar
FordAve
Regular Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:56 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby FordAve » Tue May 12, 2009 6:47 pm

It is because of the position that police associations have taken against auxiliaries, this has come about. The unions have worked so hard to limit the role of auxiliaries, that they have become pretty much in-effective. To compensate for this, the Community Safety Officer program was created.

British police unions fought the same battle against their auxiliary police and the same situation occurred. They now have a full blown CSO program. Police unions in Britain have come to realize that auxiliaires are not a threat to police jobs.

Most auxiliaires do not support the CSO position. It would be in the best interests of Canadian Police unions to work with auxiliaries and not against them.
CourtOfficer wrote:A slippery slope...

Any department with an association would have prevented this from seeing the light of day.

CO
Have a look at what has occurred in Britain. I know that police unions have a lot of power around dictating public policy, but the reality is if our government decides to move forward with the CSO program, there is nothing the associations can do about it.
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstien

"Your problem is low self-esteem. It's very common among losers."

Jim Street
Super-Ultra-Mega Poobah
Posts: 7335
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:25 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby Jim Street » Tue May 12, 2009 7:22 pm

Auxiliaries are to be used in a support function using volunteers from the community to support the regular membership.

Auxiliaries, used in the proper capacity in such a way as I mentioned, are not a threat to police jobs. This CSO program however, is.

There is no question that Auxiliaries roles are limited. As they should be.
Opinions posted are my own sole opinion not reflective of any views/thoughts of agency. Answers may or may not be truthful, As if you couldn't tell.

User avatar
th
Poobah Overlord
Posts: 3101
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:50 pm
Location: British Paraguay

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby th » Tue May 12, 2009 7:24 pm

FordAve wrote:It is because of the position that police associations have taken against auxiliaries, this has come about. The unions have worked so hard to limit the role of auxiliaries, that they have become pretty much in-effective. To compensate for this, the Community Safety Officer program was created.

British police unions fought the same battle against their auxiliary police and the same situation occurred. They now have a full blown CSO program. Police unions in Britain have come to realize that auxiliaires are not a threat to police jobs.

Most auxiliaires do not support the CSO position. It would be in the best interests of Canadian Police unions to work with auxiliaries and not against them.
CourtOfficer wrote:A slippery slope...

Any department with an association would have prevented this from seeing the light of day.

CO
Have a look at what has occurred in Britain. I know that police unions have a lot of power around dictating public policy, but the reality is if our government decides to move forward with the CSO program, there is nothing the associations can do about it.
You do realize that the RCMP doesn't have a union or an association, right? And that none of the other police services in the province that have unions have a program like this, right? So really your union conspiracy against unpaid, under-trained, under-screened volunteers really doesn't hold any water.
You can drink a shy girl crazy, you can drink 'till that good girl sins;
You can even drink an ugly girl pretty, but you can't drink a fat girl thin.

dira necessitas
Poobah Overlord
Posts: 2835
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:05 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby dira necessitas » Tue May 12, 2009 8:30 pm

Those kind of look like jump wings above that guy's left pocket...
I'm not saying there should be capital punishment for stupidity, but let's take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself.

User avatar
CourtOfficer
Site Admin
Posts: 19612
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby CourtOfficer » Tue May 12, 2009 8:47 pm

FordAve wrote:It is because of the position that police associations have taken against auxiliaries, this has come about. The unions have worked so hard to limit the role of auxiliaries, that they have become pretty much in-effective. To compensate for this, the Community Safety Officer program was created.

British police unions fought the same battle against their auxiliary police and the same situation occurred. They now have a full blown CSO program. Police unions in Britain have come to realize that auxiliaires are not a threat to police jobs.

Most auxiliaires do not support the CSO position. It would be in the best interests of Canadian Police unions to work with auxiliaries and not against them.
CourtOfficer wrote:A slippery slope...

Any department with an association would have prevented this from seeing the light of day.

CO
Have a look at what has occurred in Britain. I know that police unions have a lot of power around dictating public policy, but the reality is if our government decides to move forward with the CSO program, there is nothing the associations can do about it.
There's a lot that can be done, in fact. The creation of the position would require it be governed by the collective agreement in respect to duties, pay, etc... Without the cooperation of an association, the program would NEVER fly.

CO

User avatar
FordAve
Regular Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:56 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby FordAve » Tue May 12, 2009 9:04 pm

th wrote:
FordAve wrote:It is because of the position that police associations have taken against auxiliaries, this has come about. The unions have worked so hard to limit the role of auxiliaries, that they have become pretty much in-effective. To compensate for this, the Community Safety Officer program was created.

British police unions fought the same battle against their auxiliary police and the same situation occurred. They now have a full blown CSO program. Police unions in Britain have come to realize that auxiliaires are not a threat to police jobs.

Most auxiliaires do not support the CSO position. It would be in the best interests of Canadian Police unions to work with auxiliaries and not against them.
CourtOfficer wrote:A slippery slope...

Any department with an association would have prevented this from seeing the light of day.

CO
Have a look at what has occurred in Britain. I know that police unions have a lot of power around dictating public policy, but the reality is if our government decides to move forward with the CSO program, there is nothing the associations can do about it.
You do realize that the RCMP doesn't have a union or an association, right? And that none of the other police services in the province that have unions have a program like this, right? So really your union conspiracy against unpaid, under-trained, under-screened volunteers really doesn't hold any water.

There are a number of position papers re: auxiliaries that have been written by members of the Canadian Police Association, Association of Chiefs of Police, and the BC Mounted Police Association over the years. As many of them are long I'm not going to post them. Since all of these groups are lobbying government, they are the ones who are helping to create the policy that the auxiliary program is working with.
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstien

"Your problem is low self-esteem. It's very common among losers."

User avatar
CourtOfficer
Site Admin
Posts: 19612
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2001 1:01 am
Location: Canada

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby CourtOfficer » Tue May 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Yep, and thankfully in Ontario they are kept to their intended duties. In our service everything from their duties to the amount of hours they're permitted to volunteer in a day is all governed by the collective agreement. Trust me, this program would NOT fly with an association. Has it been tried? Indeed it has in Ontario via expansion of the Special Constable program to include more operational responsibilities and it was quickly nipped in the bud.

CO

User avatar
FordAve
Regular Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:56 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby FordAve » Tue May 12, 2009 9:10 pm

Jim Street wrote:Auxiliaries are to be used in a support function using volunteers from the community to support the regular membership.

Auxiliaries, used in the proper capacity in such a way as I mentioned, are not a threat to police jobs. This CSO program however, is.

There is no question that Auxiliaries roles are limited. As they should be.

If their role is so limited that they rendered in-effective then it's both a waste of taxpayers money and volunteers time. It also harms the communities that auxiliaries work in.
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstien

"Your problem is low self-esteem. It's very common among losers."

User avatar
FordAve
Regular Member
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 6:56 pm

Re: Community Safety Officer- "E" Div

Postby FordAve » Tue May 12, 2009 9:17 pm

CourtOfficer wrote:Yep, and thankfully in Ontario they are kept to their intended duties. In our service everything from their duties to the amount of hours they're permitted to volunteer in a day is all governed by the collective agreement. Trust me, this program would NOT fly with an association. Has it been tried? Indeed it has in Ontario via expansion of the Special Constable program to include more operational responsibilities and it was quickly nipped in the bud.

CO
I'm sorry CO but associations are not going to stop two-tiered policing. It is going to continue to grow and it would be in the best interest of the associations to work with and not against auxiliary constables.
"Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds." Albert Einstien

"Your problem is low self-esteem. It's very common among losers."


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests